See 61 FR 4044. Some commenters suggested a modification to Alternative 2 national football league los angeles rams go rams full printing ugly sweater that would have involved substitution of the word “substantial” or “significant”
national football league los angeles rams go rams full printing ugly sweater
are at variance with Congress’ clear intent. OSHA concludes that the guidance given by Congress — that employers should record and report on work-related deaths, national football league los angeles rams go rams full printing ugly sweater and on injuries and illnesses other than minor injuries, establishes the appropriate recording threshold for cases entered into the OSHA recordkeeping system. a. The significant case requirement applies equally to injuries and illnesses; employers are no longer to report insignificant illnesses.OSHA distinguishes between injuries and illnesses based on the nature of the precipitating event or exposure. Cases which result from instantaneous events are generally considered injuries, while cases which result from non-instantaneous events, such as a latent disease or cumulative trauma disorder, are considered illnesses.
Id. The third alternative test was significantly more expansive than that adopted in the final rule. Under Alternative 3, an injury or illness would be considered work-related if the work environment had any possibility of playing a causal role. 61 FR 4044. The proposed rule asked for comment on whether OSHA should abandon its historic approach and adopt a new test for determining work-relationship. 61 FR 4044, 4045. The proposal outlined three alternative tests in which the determination of work-relationship turned on the degree to which the injury or illness was linked to occupational causes, as compared with personal factors such as off-the job activities, aging, or pre-existing medical conditions. Two of these alternative tests required evidence of a high degree of work causation to establish work-relationship. Alternative 1 required that occupational factors be the “sole cause” of the injury or illness; any evidence of non-work related causal factors was sufficient to exclude the case. Alternative 2 required that occupational factors be the “predominant cause” before the case could be considered work-related.