or rather simply provided cost summaries with no indication of methodology everything will kill you so choose something fun skull racing retro poster or substantiation of unit assumptions. Others provided cost estimates that were clearly unrealistic or based on
everything will kill you so choose something fun skull racing retro poster
Section 18 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act , expresses Congress’ clear intent to preempt State laws with respect to which Federal OSHA has promulgated occupational safety or health standards. everything will kill you so choose something fun skull racing retro poster Under the OSH Act, a State can avoid preemption only if it submits, and obtains Federal approval of, a plan for the development of such standards and their enforcement. Occupational safety and health standards developed by such Plan – States must, among other things, be at least as effective as the Federal standards in providing safe and healthful employment and places of employment. As the Agency has indicated before, the cost estimates were based on the best available information, and are averages.
Firms will be expected to have costs both above and below the figures estimated. As long as estimates are based on reasonable assumptions and cost figures, the Agency has satisfied its analysis requirements to assure the rule is economically feasible. If OSHA were to rely on some or all of the assertions in the record regarding estimates of time involved in complying with the Standard, and estimates of the number of MSDSs which would be generated by the imposition of the Standard, the Standard would still be feasible in every SIC. Consequently, OSHA finds that claims of infeasible costs are not substantiated by any analysis or evidence, and that nothing in the record supports a conclusion of infeasibility in any SIC regulated under the existing rule. As was the case with comments submitted subsequent to the publication of the 1987 final rule, most of these comments either provided no specific data or evidence regarding either the costs or the analysis,