[High quality] whats up witches doormat

or instructions given in an article. There is a formal checking process for the retraction/removal procedure whats up witches doormat . It is not unusual for an author or other party to raise an objection

whats up witches doormat

it would be useful if the respective editors discuss these matters with each other . There will be many different outcomes from this. Sometimes authors “guilty” of some type of misconduct in some areas do write other whats up witches doormat papers that are completely legitimate. These matters should not be pre-judged. Every paper should be considered on its own merits. If both journals are aimed at the same community of researchers and users, it should be considered duplicate publication and treated as such. However there are instances where an article might be published in local language in a local publication, which might then be considered for re-publication in an international journal.

This of course can only happen with agreement between the two journals, and with a notice re the prior local publication, and if the editor-in-chief believes the article is significant and will reach a new or different community of readers. This is an editorial decision. The editor-in-chief must decide whether the second article adds anything at all to knowledge in the particular field. If it does not, then by definition it is duplicate publication and the corrective procedures we note in our policies should be followed . Once an article has been officially published, it is part, for good or ill, of the “minutes of science”. Librarians and researchers have a right to know what was published at a particular time and will castigate publishers who attempt to remove an article from the literature. The exceptional cases we have identified are for example when a data research subject’s privacy rights have been compromised or where significant harm could occur by improperly following directions