cannot be used as reference in future cases, To my wife love made us forever and together love your husband poster and that state law preventing discrimination in public accomodations still applies. This was a narrow ruling that didnt touch the real issue. Kind of like how a murderer could get off charges based on jury bias.
To my wife love made us forever and together love your husband poster
who’s only body part you can see are her eyes and they also wouldn’t be able to properly identify her if she committed a crime, because you can’t give service to someone or even walk into a bank wearing a hoodie on your head, but a whole head wrap is okay because of the Muslim religion. To my wife love made us forever and together love your husband poster So, why is this man being talked down on so much because of a choice he made that was fired by his religion? Because he’s a white Christian. And that’s the ONLY reason.
but the baker did win and he can choose to refuse service based on his beliefs. No I have not read the judges written opinion. However the nature of the case and the fact that the baker won indicates he can refuse. incorrect. The supreme court ruled solely on the bakers mistreatment in lower court. Was he mistreated? Yes. The court of commissions showed clear bias in this case. The supreme court refused to rule on the discrimination aspect of this case. They did, however, specifically state that this case sets no precedence,