As noted previously, Congress set forth the mandatory we’re gonna have the hap-hap-happiest christmas poster factors that DHS must consider in the public charge inadmissibility determination—these
we’re gonna have the hap-hap-happiest christmas poster
elders seeking immigration relief by treating them as economically disposable, and would have the effect of straining and fracturing families who seek to maintain seniors within the familial unit. we’re gonna have the hap-hap-happiest christmas poster inadmissibility based on public charge solely based on the age of a child. Instead, USCIS would also review the support provided by a parent or other source in the totality of the circumstances. public charge even if they present positive factors. If negative factors in the alien’s case (factors that increases an alien’s likelihood of becoming a public charge) outweigh positive factors (factors that decrease the alien’s likelihood of becoming a public charge), DHS would conclude, in the totality of the circumstances, that the applicant is inadmissible for likely becoming a public charge. Therefore,
it may be that an alien is found inadmissible in light of a heavily weighted negative factor even if he or she may be able to present positive factors. Furthermore, to ensure consistency and quality control, USCIS will provide training to officers and continue to monitor adjudications. As is the case for any adjudication at USCIS, USCIS will apply its general quality control processes for adjudications involving public charge assessments. USCIS continues its ongoing data collection efforts on its adjudications as well as other information relevant to the adjudication, to continually assess and improve the adjudication processes, procedures and training. declines to otherwise deem the sponsor’s income to the alien in the public charge context, as this kind of automatic deeming would essentially render meaningless the public charge determination for any alien with an affidavit of support. DHS does not believe Congress would have retained the public charge ground of inadmissibility, had it intended such a result.