To be clear, DHS is not taking the position that some thats what i do i read books i drink tea and i know things cat retro poster of the cases cited in the Alpert article did that someone who is incarcerated is likely to become a public charge
thats what i do i read books i drink tea and i know things cat retro poster
that there wasn’t evidence that she was likely to become a public charge); Barlin v. Rodgers, 191 F. 970, (3d Cir. 1911) (sustaining the exclusion of three impoverished immigrants, thats what i do i read books i drink tea and i know things cat retro poster the first because he had a “rudimentary” right hand affecting his ability to earn a living, the second because of poor appearance and “stammering” such that made the alien scarcely able to make himself understood, and the third because he was very small for his age); United States ex rel. Canfora v. Williams, 186 F. 354 (S.D.N.Y. 1911) . 376.Cf., e.g., Harris v. FCC, 776 F.3d 21, (D.C. Cir. 2015) (“An agency does not abuse its discretion by applying a bright-line rule consistently in order both to preserve incentives for compliance and to realize the benefits of easy
administration that the rule was designed to achieve.”); Turro v. FCC, 859 F.2d 1498, 1500 (D.C. Cir. 1988) (“Strict adherence to a general rule may be justified by the gain in certainty and administrative ease, even if it appears to result in some hardship in individual cases.”). 361. In the NPRM, DHS had proposed calculating the value of the benefit attributable to the alien in proportion to the total number of people covered by the benefit in determining the cumulative value of one or more monetizable benefits. See proposed 8 CFR 212.24, Valuation of Monetizable Benefits. 329. DHS notes the statutory wording includes the wording “at any time”—the commenter omitted the language when asserting that the interpretation is not consistent with the plain wording of the statute. 313.See generally Leo M. Alpert, The Alien and the Public Charge Clauses, 49 Yale L.J. 18, .