this is a more costly and less efficient way to distribute the information. pug why hello sweet cheeks have a seat retro poster Furthermore, as the downstream employers are not supposed to use a chemical without having the MSDS,
pug why hello sweet cheeks have a seat retro poster
“apprised” in as only requiring hazard information transmittal and not training. Clearly the intent of referencing paragraph in paragraph was to require employers pug why hello sweet cheeks have a seat retro poster to “fully implement the training provisions of the hazard communication standard for laboratory employees.” 48 FR 53288. Paragraph , therefore, has been clarified to indicate that laboratory employees must be provided both information and training in accordance with paragraph . Laboratory coverage. The current HCS limits coverage of laboratories (paragraph ), simply requiring that labels be kept on containers that are received labeled; that material safety data sheets which are received be kept, and employees be given access to them; and that employees be trained in accordance with paragraph of the rule.
Paragraph states, among other things, that employees are to be informed of the location and availability of the written hazard communication program. Since laboratories are not required to have written hazard communication programs, this part of the information and training program would not apply to these types of facilities. Although this would appear to be evident, OSHA has received a number of questions regarding this, so the provision has been modified to clarify that the location and availability of the written hazard communication program does not have to be addressed in the laboratory training program. The location and availability of material safety data sheets, which is also currently addressed under paragraph , would still have to be included in the training program. OSHA specifically recalculated the costs for distributors to the nonmanufacturing sector to consider an “on request” system (Ex. 71-70). These cost figures reiterated the findings of the original cost analysis, i.e.,