[High quality] halloween salem sanctuary for wayward cats ferals and familiars welcome black cat retro poster

the government has no legitimate interest in the law or policy or that halloween salem sanctuary for wayward cats ferals and familiars welcome black cat retro poster there is no rational link between the interest and the challenge law or regulation. Heller v. Doe by Doe, 509 U.S. 312, 319 .

halloween salem sanctuary for wayward cats ferals and familiars welcome black cat retro poster

Process Clause in the Fifth Amendment than by application of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 132.See Lewis v. Thompson, 252 F.3d 567, halloween salem sanctuary for wayward cats ferals and familiars welcome black cat retro poster (2d Cir. 2001) (“t is reasonable for Congress to believe that some aliens would be less likely to hazard the trip to this country if they understood that they would not receive government benefits upon arrival . . . Although it seems likely that many alien women will illegally immigrate to obtain the benefit of citizenship for their children, undeterred by ineligibility for prenatal care in the event of pregnancy, Congress is entitled to suppose that the denial of care will deter some of them. In the realm of immigration,

where congressional discretion is extremely broad, this supposition, even if dubious, satisfies rational basis review.”) . 124.See Korab v. Fink, 797 F.3d 572, (9th Cir. 2014) (“ederal statutes regulating alien classifications are subject to the easier-to-satisfy rational-basis review . . . Although aliens are protected by the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses, this protection does not prevent Congress from creating legitimate distinctions either between citizens and aliens or among categories of aliens and allocating benefits on that basis.”) ; Lewis v. Thompson, 252 F.3d 567, 570 (2d Cir. 2001) (describing the level of scrutiny owed under the constitution to federal regulation of immigration and naturalization as “highly deferential”) (citing Lake v. Reno, 226 F.3d 141, 148 (2d Cir. 2000).) Generally, laws and regulations that neither involve fundamental rights nor include suspect classifications are reviewed under rational basis scrutiny, under which the person challenging the law must show that