We believe the additional information sought by Question 16 is irrelevant and would not, custom name pabst blue ribbon beer full printing shirt in any event, justify a second set of reporting forms for every recordable incident subject to federal or state OSHA jurisdiction.
custom name pabst blue ribbon beer full printing shirt
the record evidence gathered in the course of this rulemaking, and a number of changes designed to simplify recordkeeping for employers. custom name pabst blue ribbon beer full printing shirt In addition, the forms have been revised to facilitate the use of equivalent forms and employers’ ability to computerize their records. OSHA continues to believe that easy linkage of the Forms 300 and 301 will be beneficial to all users of these data. Thus, the final Form 301 contains a space for the case file number. The file/case number is required on both forms to allow persons reviewing the forms to match an individual OSHA Form 301 with a specific entry on the OSHA Form 300. Access by authorized employee
representatives to the information contained on the OSHA Form 301 is limited to the information on the right side of the form (see § 1904.35 of the final rule). The case/file number is the data element that makes a link to the OSHA Form 300 possible. OSHA believes that this requirement will add very little burden to the recordkeeping process, because the OSHA Log has always required a unique file or case number. The final Form 301 requirement simply requires the employer to place the same number on the OSHA 301 form. Items 5, 6, 7, and 13 on the OSHA Form 301 presents problems for direct employers of longshoremen. Longshoremen are hired on a daily basis, select their own health care provider; may be treated at a facility of their choice, and may not return to the same employer when returning to work. e strongly disagree with the approach reflected in Question 16.